🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin traveled to India four years ago, the global landscape was markedly different. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, centered around discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that period preceded a significant shift in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of heavy trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Both Nations

The high-level meeting occurs at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader arrives following rejecting latest peace proposals for Ukraine, bolstered by claimed advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its very occurrence," commented a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to a form of normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country navigates a difficult international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

This delicate balance was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a joint opinion piece questioning Russia's peace efforts. This elicited a firm response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership originates from the Soviet period and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top arms provider. This alliance was generally accepted by the West before a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of discounted Russian oil. However, recently stalled diplomacy, accusations mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in US-India ties.

"In response, India has reverted to its default strategy of maintaining multiple options," explained a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's fundamental concern with Russia is geography. "Beijing continues to be the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has relied on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in recent years.

"Delhi will try to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced economic cooperation is likely to be a major topic. The Russian leader has publicly stressed plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of energy purchases remains central. While the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to increase imports of US energy.

A Russian official acknowledged "hurdles" in energy trade but insisted it would proceed uninterrupted. The official minimized the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be addressed primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, India lacks the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the war," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to make a difference is limited."

In the end, despite the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.