🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.